Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/At Ease (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 18:42, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

At Ease (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM  ttonyb (talk) 22:39, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:07, 12 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep This is indeed a notable film, having screened at film festivals and having been widely released on DVD, including on Amazon.com. Film has an IMDB entry.  Additionally, the filmmaker is a notable figure. Filmjunkie19 (talk) 23:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment – Please help me understand how any of this meets the criteria in WP:NOTFILM.  ttonyb (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete... and Userfy if reqested per WP:TOOSOON. As it has only recently been released on DVD, we can let it back on mainspace once (or if) decent third-party reviews become available.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:17, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. IMDB and Amazon.com are not reliable sources. Nor is the film maker a notable figure, his notability is as questionable as the subject of this one's. --res Laozi speak  02:33, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.