Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/At the Throne of Judgment (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:15, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

At the Throne of Judgment
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This has been previously put up for afd and deleted. This one still seems to lack criteria needed by WP:Notability (music). - Warthog Demon  22:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable and even a few neutrality problems.  Jonjonbt's name is   now Jonathan.   23:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Also: They don't have a real website, just a MySpace. That tells me that they're even less notable. Most notable bands do have a MySpace, but also a real website.  Jonjonbt's name is   now Jonathan.   23:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, re-posting of an article that was deleted via a previous AfD. If the author wanted to resuscitate this article, it should have been taken to deletion review. Them's the rules. But let's ignore the first AfD for a moment and address the article as it stands now: Non-notable band, no valid references (see WP:YMINAR). Realkyhick 00:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Per Realkyhick. On its own merits, a google search does show this is at least a slightly notable band, but not enough coverage for WP notability. i said 03:42, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep although they were at first a non notable band, they have recently signed to a new label and have released a full-length album. It should be noted that the label is not known for deathcore bands, so either they are taking a long shot, or are ready to invest in a new genre, and will increase their awareness (this is speculative). Jlricherson 21:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: a single album is insufficient to meet the notability guideline at WP:BAND. Their new label (and album) may eventually lead to notability, but does not provide it.  With no references, no reliable sources, there's nothing here to meet Verifiability policy, which is non-negotiable.  But even if it were verifiable, it would still fall short of our notability guidelines.  Also should have gone to deletion review before being recreated, but that wouldn't be a major problem if they were notable and the article demonstrated it.  But they're not and it doesn't.  Xtifr tälk 11:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.