Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atea (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  14:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Atea (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I tried to translate some sources but they don’t fit with policy for company notability. Didn’t find anything new also. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 17:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 17:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Norway.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete This is a company/organization therefore NCORP guidelines apply. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability but I'm also open to reviewing and references that others might find. Until then, not a single reference can be found and therefore this topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 12:47, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.