Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ateneo Art Gallery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Less Unless (talk) 15:18, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Ateneo Art Gallery

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced and promotional The Banner  talk 09:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:33, 14 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak delete, unless someone is willing to rewrite this article by adding citations and removing the promotional crap. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 11:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject is notable - references would be nice, but this is no reason for deletion. Johnbod (talk) 13:02, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: The article needs some clean-up by removing anything promotional. Other than that, I managed to find some reliable sources about the museum. There's a paper about the museum. It is discussed in a few books: and . It is briefly described in this book as the first museum of modern art in the country. It is also briefly discussed in this book. With these, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Looks pretty notable and per sourcing found above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:40, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge To Ateneo de Manila University. Since the art gallery is already mentioned there and I don't think the sources are good enough at this point to warrant an independent article. Especially after you get rid of the promotional crap. The few (apparently trivial) sources we do have are good enough to justify a merge though. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG with sources presented by Astig. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 01:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets GNG with new sources.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.