Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ateneo Blue Eagles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP applies in this case. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:56, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Ateneo Blue Eagles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fanpage, advertising The Banner  talk 11:38, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 12:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - a plethora of sources (here's just one) makes this an easy decision. It needs a major cleanup though. schetm (talk) 12:43, 21 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - the article is an absolute train wreck and desperately needs to be cleaned up, however as far as I can tell it does not meet any of the WP:DEL-REASON — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSLEEVEmonkey (talk • contribs) 15:53, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Than you have a different view on advertising than I have. The Banner  talk 18:34, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - The issue is the obvious promotional tone and not a notability issue. There is a lot of puffery about Ateneo varsity athletes being exceptional and other subjective values. College sports is a big thing in the Philippines (at least the UAAP teams) like in the United States and has been frequently covered by the third-party national media sources. I have attempted to overhaul the article, but one significant contributor keeps reverting back the contentious content and seems to be overzealous of editing schools. There is a lack of feedback from them if they contest a reversion.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: Clearly notable. No valid reason was given for deletion. SL93 (talk) 22:03, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Advertising is no valid reason for deletion? The Banner  talk 23:57, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes. Tag it for cleanup or something instead of nominating a notable topic for deletion. SL93 (talk) 23:59, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Aha, the classic promotion of advertising by doing nothing. The Banner  talk 01:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Aha, you're not changing my opinion and debating this with me will be fruitless. SL93 (talk) 01:29, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * At least you are honest enough to say that you will not act upon your own words. 07:20, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * When did I say such a thing? SL93 (talk) 16:02, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Promotional content does not qualify for deletion. Cleanup is just needed. AmericanAir88(talk) 14:53, 28 June 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.