Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ateneo Social Science Research Center (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ateneo de Manila University. There appears to be general consensus for a redirect. (non-admin closure) Red Phoenix  talk  01:16, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Ateneo Social Science Research Center
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, advertising based on related sources. Institute of the jesuit Ateneo de Manila University, not notable enough for a separate article. WP:COI. The Banner talk 16:54, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ateneo Social Science Research Center Ateneo de Manila University. I agree with nominator that it is not notable enough for a separate article — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 18:32, 7 August 2018 (UTC) fixed infinite loop  — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 11:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * --Do you mean to redirect the article to itself? That would be fun:-) &#x222F; WBG converse 08:23, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 19:55, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary <b style="color: black;">Talk</b> 19:55, 7 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete or Redirect Lacks independent sources to establish notability. It is a shame that the article creator does not seem to understand what constitutes notability and good sourcing, and that a half dozen or so editors have to run around cleaning up the large field of Jesuit themed articles with extremely poor sourcing.96.127.243.251 (talk) 07:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Absolutely.The article creator is still incompetent (as evident from the sources, he present at these AfDs from time to time) and a half dozen editors have to go after him, cleaning his mess....... &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 08:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete-Zero notability.Do not even merit a redirect.All these private universities and their ventures, manifested in their individual articles by crafty spammers. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 08:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * There is enough coverage to satisfy the weaker WP:NOTEWORTHY criteria, so a redirect is appropriate. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 11:20, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect as above with no prejudice for future split off if better sourcing can be found Chetsford (talk) 00:30, 14 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.