Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atgeflu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:23, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Atgeflu
Article describes Pope Atgeflü, a 17-year old founding father of the Church of the Exploding Sheep. This appears to be a way of entertaining classmates during A-level English lessons. Sliggy 14:47, 29 October 2005 (UTC) Nominators cant vote Prashanthns 18:17, 29 October 2005 (UTC) Sorry for the strike-off in error. AfD Nominators can vote Prashanthns 18:54, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, unverifiable, etc. Sliggy 14:50, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Can you point me to the relevant guideline please? Also, if no-nominator-voting is true, someone needs to update the guidance text at the foot of WP:AFD/Today, which I was following. Sliggy 18:42, 29 October 2005 (UTC) Sliggy 23:25, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is truly a amazing article whatever about the content it really shows the skill level among students that they are able to come up with a story like this. So what if it is for "entertaining classmates during A-level English lessons" we all can remember that time and i'm sure we would have liked somethink like this. GO ATGEFLU!!! kinsailor 16:06, 29 October 2005 (GMT)


 * Delete and BJAODN Even though I think that basic arithmetic should be the minimum criteria for people wanting to delete articles (2005 - 1978 = 17 / I'm sorry Sliggy go back to your seat - no icecream for you today). Besides, if you read the article it clearly states that the cult has been founded through a series of e-mails and I don't know about you but in my school they didn't have computers for A-level English (only good old-fashioned pen and paper). Besides it's the "Cult of the Exploding Sheep" not the Church. 129.31.73.9 15:15, 29 October 2005 (UTC) Page creator. Votes here only other edits. -- Sliggy 23:29, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete nonsense. Joyous  (talk) 15:22, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Utter rubbish. Lincolnite 16:36, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Regardless of how hilarious fans think it is, regardless of the skill, and regardless of how memorable an inside joke it may be, it's NN and not encyclopedic. Devotchka 17:42, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Very well written and funny and all. But, not notable and not encyclopediac. Good Joke. Strong DeletePrashanthns 18:17, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete and BJAODN - Just zis Guy, you know? 22:49, 29 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as per WP:V. While heads of real churches are notable, there is no evidence that he is. Possible BJAODN. Capitalistroadster 23:49, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is why we need a Speedy category for "obvious hoax or unencyclopedic nonsense". MCB 00:34, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.