Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athésia (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Athésia
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

The AfD in 2005 resulted in no consensus. Since then, no other substantive proof of notability has come up, so I think it's time for a second AfD. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 23:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:05, 18 January 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete - Ahh 2005, those halcyon days when google hits and imdb mentions could carry the day. Fast forward to 2012, where guest spots and an unnoticed solo release do not at all meet the general notability or WP:NMUSIC. Tarc (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Scott Montieth, since her guest spots on his albums are her primary "notability". (Though even he needs referencing improvements, his basic notability isn't as much in question.) It's true, and entirely appropriate, that our notability rules have tightened up considerably since 2005, but a person who isn't really notable enough for her own article can still be "notable" enough to warrant redirection to a related article. Bearcat (talk) 17:00, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep:  I think the issue of notability arises due to the fact that her work is mainly in a language other than English and that in 2005, she was new and relatively unknown. I have added this to the article: DonaldRichardSands (talk) 14:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Update: We now have several citations included in the Athésia article. (all dated after the AfD 2005 discussion.)  DonaldRichardSands (talk) 15:33, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 13:01, 25 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep, on the basis of apparent international exposure, but the article is in dire need of better references/citations.  PK  T (alk)  23:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per expansion and improvements made after the nomination. Cavarrone (talk) 08:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.