Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athar Aamir Khan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as all votes were for Keep/Strong Keep or either comments per WP:SIGCOV also clearly passed WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Aj Ajay Mehta 007 (talk) 18:48, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Close vacacted per Deletion review/Log/2021 August 26. New close is procedural no consensus. Daniel (talk) 22:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Athar Aamir Khan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability. Being a commissioner of a city doe not make anyone notable. Fails WP:GNG. Moreover 2nd runner of IAS Entrance Exam also not sufficient to make him Noable. DMySon (talk) 07:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 07:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 07:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DMySon (talk) 07:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep/Strong keep - The article passes WP:GNG. Kindly perform a WP:BEFORE, you can find enough to pass GNG. --Sreeram Dilak (talk) 07:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - although the article is copiously referenced (its creator, @Sreeram Dilak, has certainly found plenty of good press mentions) the question to me is whether his current career posts, although well-referenced, are sufficiently notable to make him notable. I do not know. Also being a CEO of a company does not automatically make someone notable. It may be Too Soon. Certainly the number of times he took a civil service exam, and his exact marks, are not relevant to an encyclopaedia article, and I'm not sure all the family details are appropriate. If the article survives, it probably needs editing to concentrate on more on his notable achievements and less on his personal life. Elemimele (talk) 14:38, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to have enough coverage to meet notability. Alice Jason (talk) 05:11, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Uncertain if hte position is intrinsically notable. But most of the references and text in the original version was PR, self-praise, and gossip. To give the article a chance, I removed those sections. The principles for doing so are NOT TABLOID and NOT AUTOBIOGRAPHY.  DGG' ( talk ) 04:43, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.