Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atharva (2023 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I didn't mean to relist this discussion but to close it as Draftify as an ATD. Sorry for the goof. Liz Read! Talk! 18:39, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Atharva (2023 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Atharva (2023 film)

This seems to be an unreleased film. It seems to be an unreleased film because one of the sources announced that the film would be released in June (meaning 2023). However, a Google search does not find any reviews, and does find references to the film being upcoming and pending release. The references are the usual announcements naming the director and the cast.

None of the references indicate that the film has been released. This article was moved to draft space once with the notation to wait for release, and has been moved back to article space, and does not seem to have been released. The plot is unreferenced and therefore unverified. (At least, the copyvio detector didn't find it.) Since the plot is unverified, there isn't enough to be worth draftifying. When it is released, a new article can be written. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Well, one editor argues for Draftifying while another is arguing against it. Any more opinions? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:15, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify per above. DareshMohan (talk) 18:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete because contents are really just a theorised plot summary and a cast list with lots of random grammatical mistakes - I don't see the point of drafting because everything will need to be redone at some point anyways. Karnataka (talk) 06:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Draftify. The skeleton of the article will be useful upon release. I also don't think the sources are unusable, just insufficient to support an article at this time. When it is released and reviewed it should easily generate enough coverage to warrant an article. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:55, 22 July 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify - Even if it has to be rewritten, the draft at least eliminates some work from future editors by preserving the sources that are present for a little background as opposed to an entirely blank slate. If it is not notable to get future edits, then it will result in a G13 delete anyway. -2pou (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.