Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atheist Universe: Why God Didn't Have A Thing To Do With It


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep/move. Andrew c [talk] 02:13, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Atheist Universe: Why God Didn't Have A Thing To Do With It
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails Notability (books). Self-published book, with no references, or assertion of notability. Hornet35 15:44, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to Athiest Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism (Corrected typo) .  This is the title of the second edition of the book, and with an Amazon sales rank of #912 and 169 customer reviews (as of 27 August 2007), the second edition of this book is hardly non-notable.  Neil916 (Talk) 16:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism (note spelling), per Neil916. Squiddy | (squirt ink?)  16:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Move, per Neil, but with Squiddy's spelling. Skarioffszky 17:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Move per Squiddy, notable book per Neil916. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 17:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to correct title. Shoester 06:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete unless there are actual published reviews from reliable sources. Customer reviews on Amazon do not make it, regardless of number. DGG (talk) 06:24, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Move to correct title, per neil. ornis ( t ) 06:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge content into David Mills (author) article and add redirects (including fixing what would be a double redirect on Atheist Universe) . The book has reviews (odd hits here and there) but most reviewers concentrate on Dawkins and the other biggies so this gets little airtime. As long as we deem Mills to be notable enough for Wikipedia then we can add his book titles to his own article. Ttiotsw 06:34, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.