Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athens Human Rights Festival


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Copyvio. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:47, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Athens Human Rights Festival

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Festival, but notability not asserted. Oscarthecat (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. No refernces provided by author, but a search of Google News does show coverage by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution and the Red and Black, the University of Georgia's student newspaper. Plus it's been around for 30 years. Article needs a lot of work, though. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Strong Keep:It is notable. Definitely. Comment": Those reasons don't justify making your keep weak.Hello, My Name Is SithMAN8 (talk) 01:37, 9 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment:Why is it definitely notable? You gave no reasons whatsoever. My reasons for a weak keep are entirely justified as indicated above. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep Event appears to be notable, but there are no references provided. Netalarm   talk  05:40, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep but only if someone cleans it up and references it properly. Billbowery (talk) 05:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The full information about the festival is at http://www.athenshumanrightsfest.org/history.html  -- an earlier deleted version is a copyvio of it. To nominate for AfD 71 minutes after the re-creation began is premature. recognize the nom couldn't see the earlier version, and the deleting admin seems to have given an deletion summary not including the url that was the source, but it would have immediately appeared at google.   Thereis enough material in the article copied to indicate that it is notable.   DGG ( talk ) 00:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I could be missing something here, but it's still a copyvio of http://www.athenshumanrightsfest.org/history.html surely? --Oscarthecat (talk) 06:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NODEADLINE applies only if the article is merely poorly written, rather than a copyright violation. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.