Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Athomejoblistings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 10:09, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Athomejoblistings

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD. Unreferenced article on a corporate which appears to fail WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:57, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Marking for speedy No indication of significance, promotional. EEng (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, spam.  Corvus cornix  talk  20:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note': I declined the speedy. Not because it is wrong per se but because the user is new and may be able to fix the problems in the intervening days of the afd. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable website, fails WP:CORP should have been speedy deleted.  Teapot  george  Talk  22:47, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks any coverage in reliable sources. The claims for notability are nebulous ("one of the largest", "one of the first") and fail verifiability. -- Whpq (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 23:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.