Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Coast Media Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 07:21, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Atlantic Coast Media Group

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article is promotional / spam, would like to nominate it for non-notable as well! Srck (talk) 20:37, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete So these are the people behind those sexist Hydroxytone ads (I want to slap the guy who keeps being amazed one woman looks 'like she did from twenty years ago'). No true notability beyond being the television/radio equivalent of WP:SPAM and the only G-hits (of 293 uniques) I can find are directory listings, Wiki-mirrors to this article, gloat articles and dissatisfied consumer reports about how they can't get their money back. G-news is even sadder, only 13, and all of them are PR.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:32, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Editing is a more appropriate remedy if there are legitimate shortcomings in the current article. The article is heavily sourced from top-tier print/online publications such as Inc. Magazine & the New York Times and the linked references are all clickable.  The article is not promotional or spam.  It is informational, properly referenced and the tone is neutral.  Non-notable?  The notes within the article refute this. WP:COMPANY Since when does not liking a commercial constitute grounds for deleting an article? Skinuser (talk) 22:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)skinuser   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skinuser (talk • contribs) 16:35, 29 June 2011 (UTC)  — Skinuser (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per arguments listed by User:Mrschimpf. Jevansen (talk) 07:08, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Except for the one mention in the New York Times (in an article about a job fair), the required independent reliable sources are lacking. (The Inc. Magazine listing is just that - a listing, a company profile, not an article about the company.) --MelanieN (talk) 00:51, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.