Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlas Benjelloun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Atlas Benjelloun

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable. He is the grandson of a billionaire and is a venture capitalist himself. Neither makes him notable. I debated about redirecting to his grandfather's article or the company's article, but decided to take it to AfD and see what the consensus was. Singularity42 (talk) 20:08, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Singularity42 (talk) 20:08, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Morocco-related deletion discussions. Singularity42 (talk) 20:08, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find even a shred of media coverage. If a reliable source can link him with his alleged grandfather Othman Benjelloun, then I'm happy with redirect but, for now, deletion is the only valid outcome. LinkedIn is a completely unacceptable source for a businessperson BLP. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - The creator of the article has repeatedly blanked the article page since this AfD started. There's an anon editor who has contributed substantially to the article - if they are the same person, this article would qualify for speedy deletion under G7.  That being said, I am going to keep this AfD up, as I think it is better to go through this now, rather than speedy delete under G7 only for the article to get recreated a short time later. Singularity42 (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability is not inherited.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

I do not agree with deleting the article because it is a well-known figure in the family — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.140.164.78 (talk) 12:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.