Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlas of the Klondike Gold Rush


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Klondike Gold Rush. As per, the content is already present in the main article -- nothing to merge. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 01:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Atlas of the Klondike Gold Rush

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not really sure what to think of this page. It's currently an unsourced orphan, but both of these can probably be solved by editing. But is this kind of article what we want/need on Wikipedia? We should have articles where these images are used to support and illustrate the text, not articles where the images are basically the only information in the article. It's perhaps slightly more than WP:NOTGALLERY, but is it sufficient? And if we do add text, then isn't it just a fork of Klondike Gold Rush? Fram (talk) 12:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge with Klondike Gold Rush. I can't see how it needs an article of its own, and any information added to give context and move away from WP:NOTGALLERY is likely to duplicate the other article. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete/Merge Most of this information already exists at Klondike Gold Rush which is where it should have remained. User:Soerfm has been making good image-centric contributions but I welcome him/her to discuss proposed forks on the talk page before going ahead.  Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Klondike Gold Rush. In fact, it may merely be "redirect" as the maps appear to be appneded to that article.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:26, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.