Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlasview Ltd v Brightview Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)  D u s t i *poke* 05:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Atlasview Ltd v Brightview Ltd

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to be a notable court case, as establised by WP:N; I see no evidence that this case is the subject of indepth coverage by reliable sources. I am, of course, willing to be proven wrong here, but I can't find anything myself. Jayron  32  06:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not really sure why, just because YOU see no evidence that the case is the subject of indepth coverage by reliable sources, that you need to put up one of these pages. There is the neutral citation: as a case in the High Court, it's notable alone. And, Jayron, you can't have looked very hard, I'm afraid! But it is a reasonably important precedent anyway. Hope that clears it up.  Wik idea  10:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Keep article is notable but needs cross referencing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meritstarzzz (talk • contribs) 15:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as in the first paragraph, there is a good explanation of why this is an important legal precedent. Kansan (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination Because of added citations. Thanks for making Wikipedia better and more complete, to whomever did so!  -- Jayron  32  22:01, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.