Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AtomPHP


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:39, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

AtomPHP

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The topic has very few search results and tone is promotional. Makecat Talk  08:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:34, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Delete It has no sources. (WP:SOURCE) Does not seem notable, (WP:NOTE), is somewhat bias (WP:NPOV) and there really isn't much information on the page and if it isn't notable enough there really can't be much added to the page. Ziiike (talk) 02:17, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure spam. Unless we really want a Wikipedia page saying things like "Atom focuses on running ridiculously fast" and "leaving the rest of fun stuff up to you and your favorite libraries." Kill it quick. --MelanieN (talk) 22:43, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.