Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atom Bond


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The "keep" side does not address the obvious problems with the sources.  Sandstein  13:55, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Atom Bond

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NTELEVISION. None of the sources in the article have WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed nothing with SIGCOV.  // Timothy ::  talk  04:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  04:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  04:52, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: The article has got good sources and at least one source that isn't related to the topic and the page and sources are reliable and have sufficient coverage which meets WP:SIGCOV and all those other 'policies'/rules/guidelines. BAABNRRBBORB1 (talk) 07:32, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment This vote was malformed and has been fixed. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 07:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Source evaluation table:  // Timothy ::  talk  13:20, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. –Laundry<b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d  c̄ ) 07:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.  Some Dude From North Carolina  (talk) 15:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: There are know seven sources, not six.
 * Added IMDB database entry to above source table. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"> // Timothy ::  talk  02:11, 9 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. No references that are reliable sources with significant coverage. No potential redirect targets. –<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d c̄ ) 01:01, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep: Well written, has at least one good source. Norman_Roswin_Rolf_Birkner (talk) 10:10, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Reply:, which source(s) do you think have SIGCOV? Thanks, <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"> // Timothy ::  talk  02:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Reply: The IMDb date listing to me is a SIGCOV Source, also keep in mind clips of the show could be listed as sources for the characters and episodes section of the article and could be SIGcOV however they're probably considered unreliable or to close to the subject. Norman_Roswin_Rolf_Birkner (talk) 6:49, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * IMDb is not a reliable source per WP:IMDB and WP:IMDBREF.  Some Dude From North Carolina  (talk) 18:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't see any real coverage. Doctorhawkes (talk) 05:54, 12 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.