Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atom Cianfarani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Atom Cianfarani

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a fashion designer, written with a advertorial skew to it and not referenced to any reliable source coverage: right across the board, every single source here is a blog, an entry for her company in a business directory, a glancing namecheck of her existence in an article that isn't substantively about her, or the mere mention of her name in the caption to a photograph. Article was initially tagged for BLPPROD, but the inadequate sourcing was added afterward — but this is not the kind of sourcing it takes to get a fashion designer into Wikipedia: she must be substantively the subject of coverage in reliable sources to earn one. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if it can be written and sourced properly. Bearcat (talk) 00:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:22, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:23, 17 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not properly sourced.--DThomsen8 (talk) 19:14, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as unfortunately still questionable for the applicable creative biographies notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:17, 21 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.