Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atom Publishing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Atom Publishing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 28 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * delete no evidence of notability. single-purpose article creator; must be vanity.- Altenmann >t 05:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: I did find one source mentioning the firm and its founder (Marketing Week, 2001 via Highbeam (subscription reqd) but it is a passing mention and insufficient to establish notability. AllyD (talk) 07:59, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.