Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  MBisanz  talk 20:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Atomera

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Has not attracted enough coverage to meet WP:CORP SmartSE (talk) 12:19, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep, actually. I'm usually quite allergic to company writeups that rake together splinters of notability, but here I believe we are just over the threshold. These four used sources each are independent, reasonably in-depth, and more than passing mentions of the company, and I'd say that in the aggregate they do the trick. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 22:44, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with Elmidae. Mccapra (talk) 23:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.