Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomic Cartoons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 03:00, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Atomic Cartoons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of meeting WP:ORG or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep - I just looked over this. This isn't 5 guys who sang together at a bar once and called themselves a band. Is this nom a joke and I missed it? - jc37 21:03, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think this might have been a bit hasty.  I understand that the article looks bad, but there's coverage in reliable sources.  There's a bit at the Vancouver Sun, including  and ; quite a few hits at Animation Magazine, such as  (but many look like press releases); and quite a lot of hits at Animation World Network, such as  and .  They also hit Variety in a couple articles that are admittedly a bit skimpy, such as .  Even if you discarded the Vancouver Sun results as local coverage and the Variety hits as trivial mentions, there'd still be quite a lot left at the animation-specific sites.  I think this article needs cleanup and expansion rather than deletion. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 23:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per the convincing arguments above. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.