Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomic Energy Insights (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Atomic Energy Insights
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Second nomination. Article has not improved since last AfD 6 months ago. Non-notable journal, seems to be more of a blog nowadays (what exactly is not clear from their website). Article misses all of the criteria of WP:Notability (Academic Journals). Even if this is not regarded as an academic journal, it misses all of the criteria of Notability (media). The article lists 2 other articles that have cited this journal, which is far from being sufficient to satisfy either of the 2 notability guidelines cited above. Delete. Crusio (talk) 22:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 22:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 'Delete - the cited sources do not, as far as I can tell, support the claims that they are cited for, which leaves the article completely failing WP:N. Even were the sources to contain the information claimed, I'm not sure that the fact the publication has been mentioned in two separate places constitutes significant discussion of it by its peers - it would still fail WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:37, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not even in Ulrich's, a very basic criterion.   DGG ( talk ) 23:38, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Listed at WikiProject Academic Journals/Deletion. --Crusio (talk) 06:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per DGG; also, very few Ghits at Google scholar . Bearian (talk) 00:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.