Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atrangi Re (soundtrack)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Atrangi Re. The Keep !votes are without sourcing that are about the soundtrack and not the film, or backing in guidelines. A merger to where it's already discussed makes sense. Star  Mississippi  03:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Atrangi Re (soundtrack)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A film soundtrack that does not meet the requirements of WP:NALBUM. Most of the content is sourced from interviews and routine promotional coverage. Regardless, the album may be merged into the film article Atrangi Re which is just over 12 kb in total. Ab207 (talk) 10:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Ab207 (talk) 10:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ab207 (talk) 10:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge with Atrangi Re: That can help expand the parent article which is too small. Kailash29792 (talk)  15:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose: I had edited the contents of the article. 122.178.238.128 (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, IP. Some of the links you added in reception section are not working/misleading. Eg. HT, TOI. Also, it will be helpful if you explain why the article should not be merged. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: In process of expanding Atrangi Re page. Also, the soundtrack article meets WP:NMUSIC. Arjann (talk) 05:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Can you elaborate how does the soundtrack article meet NMUSIC? As per my searches, the ablum lacks reliable independent reviews of its own. -- Ab207 (talk) 06:29, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't wish to owe too much explanation for the contributions made. Whatever it is, the article definitely meets NMUSIC.         requesting your views — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arjann (talk • contribs) 13:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , I believe making an explaination would strengthen your argument. Also, the ping doesn't work when you don't sign the comment in the same edit but I would avoid making such pings per WP:CANVASS. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:34, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , I don't have time to argue and face unnecessary discussion on this. This is not the first time I am coming across someone like you who is hell bent on deleting a page that meets WP:NMUSIC. I am quite busy. You may carry on but I am done.          requesting you all to take this ahead on behalf Arjann (talk) 17:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:30, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Arjann. Article needs to be trimmed by removing anything, including sources, not related to the album. Other than that, the rest of the sources which talk about the album seem reliable. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 15:30, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Most sources are about the film, rather than the album itself. The soundtrack must be independently notable to meet WP:NALBUM, else, it should be merged with the film article. -- Ab207 (talk) 17:00, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 13:25, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NALBUM per above arguments. SBKSPP (talk) 00:56, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * How exactly does it meet NALBUM requirements without a single reliable review of album, rather than the film. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:09, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * merge to the main article. Creating separate articles for soundtracks should be the exception.  DGG ( talk ) 06:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.