Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atrina Brill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:42, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Atrina Brill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Slatersteven (talk) 11:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Zero results on Google News; I've never seen that before. I could not locate any reliable third party sources. Doesn't pass WP:GNG. Cait.123 (talk) 12:50, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Even by advice columnist standards Brill seems unnotable. It is not even clear that she has a regular publication home, as opposed to just an online presence. Advice columnists need widespread coverage of their work to be shown to be notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Stet Her professional title is Atrina Lovekins, and she is sometimes simply "Atrina". Google will not show much under "Brill" as it is her birth name. https://www.atrina.nyc

In NYC she is one of the leaders in the sex-positive community, and as of this month she has just been named the cohost of a well-known advice column called "Poly Wanna Answer?" with Leon Feingold
 * All of that seems to be true, but that isn't enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article. Any article has to meet the Notability guidelines. I haven't been able to find any credible third party coverage to show she meets this standards (under Lovekins, Brill, nothing). If you have any sources, please add them to the article. I'd happily change my mind if such sources exist. Cait.123 (talk) 16:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. No notability established. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 11:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I gave the google a little scour. Can't find anything that counts to GNG. Carrite (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only one ref, does not seem notable. L293D (☎ • ✎) 22:49, 9 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.