Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atromeroptic Law

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. JamesTeterenko 03:45, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

Atromeroptic Law
No such physics law. This is a made up fact. Hfwd 00:53, 15 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - I see no evidence that such a law exists. Google yields nine results - 7 from Wikipedia and its mirrors, and 2 from this bizarre website the article sites.  Looks like original research to me. --JJLeahy 04:54, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. -- BD2412 talk 03:24, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nominator.Dottore So 03:53, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't verify, possibly original research. A search on atromeroptic yielded essentially the same results as the above mentioned search, so atromeroptic appears to be a neologism, which, to me, says that this alleged law is not encyclopedic. ManoaChild 11:16, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above, along with Atromeroptics Tonywalton 18:43, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, of course. --Pjacobi 20:45, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research Salsb 11:14, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.