Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attack! Pro Wrestling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  So Why  08:42, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Attack! Pro Wrestling

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable wrestling promotion, lack of GNG sources and the article reads like an ad. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:53, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   12:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   12:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Receives pretty regular coverage from Wrestling Observer Newsletter and others listed at WP:PW/RS..LM2000 (talk) 07:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep This promotion is covered by reliable sources. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Pete Dunne is the current WWE UK Champion; how is his UK promotion "non-notable"?--CheShA (talk) 12:37, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * This is not a valid keep argument. Please see WP:NOTINHERITED. The promotion is not notable just because its owner is notable. It has to be notable in its own right by having significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Nikki  ♥  311   21:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 18:57, 31 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.