Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attack on Delhi Chief Minister's house


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This Keep closure does not disallow future AFD proposals with more solid deletion rationale. Liz Read! Talk! 19:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Attack on Delhi Chief Minister's house

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:UNDUE WP:BREAKING WP:DELAY WP:RECENCY WP:10YEARTEST Kejarwal was attacked in the past too why not no pages for [previous attacks https://www.dailyo.in/humour/arvind-kejriwal-slapped-kejriwal-slapped-aam-aadmi-party-politics-elections-arvind-kejriwal-funny/story/1/30561.html] Ddd421 (talk) 08:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC) — Ddd421 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Speedy keep: no valid rationale for deletion provided. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 08:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment there are no pages for previous attacks. So this page too not warrant a space in wikipedia. Ddd421 (talk) 08:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * you may want to read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS – it says, basically, that every article should be considered standalone in discussions like these. If you think pages don't exist that should exist, write them! If they meet guidelines for inclusion. But the lack of one article isn't a reason to delete another. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 08:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment It is wise to delay writing an article about a breaking news event until the significance of the event is clearer as early coverage may lack perspective and be subject to factual errors. Writing about breaking news may be recentism, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball WP:DELAY Ddd421 (talk) 09:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Will someone ten years from now be confused about how this article is written? In ten years will this addition still appear relevant? If I am devoting more time to it than other topics in the article, will it appear more relevant than what is already here? WP:10YEARTEST Ddd421 (talk) 09:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: I created the article. WP:SKCRIT applies as above. Article passes WP:NEVENT as it was a major political and crime incident. Venkat TL (talk) 08:47, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * CommentWP:BREAKING Ddd421 (talk) 08:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * CommentWP:DELAY Ddd421 (talk) 08:58, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:CENSOR. Venkat TL (talk) 09:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Will someone ten years from now be confused about how this article is written? In ten years will this addition still appear relevant? If I am devoting more time to it than other topics in the article, will it appear more relevant than what is already here? WP:10YEARTEST Ddd421 (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment kejariwal was attacked/slapped regularly in the past. add all other past event and remane the page to attacks on arvind kejariwal then is page may pass WP:RECENCY WP:10YEARTEST Ddd421 (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You have expressed your opinion. I suggest you let others express theirs. You have already made 20+ edits on this AfD page. you will be blocked from here, if you do not stop WP:BADGERING Venkat TL (talk) 09:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * ok, thanks Ddd421 (talk) 10:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:UNDUE is not a valid reasoning for AFD. The article is written in neutral tone, the article is well sourced from multiple sources, the event is notable. SunDawn  talk  08:51, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Commentthe reason is the absence of pages for previous attacks on kejariwal thats why this page shall not be on wiki Ddd421 (talk) 08:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2022 April 6.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 08:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep That other alleged attacks do not have their own articles is no rationale for deletion (which should be merging to his bio, if we do anything at all). Nominator has been editing less than a day, with all his edits on this matter - clear SPA. Johnbod (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy deleteThis article is a good example of WP:BREAKING. 'attacks' like this is common on politicians in Delhi. Anatoli eye (talk) 05:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC) — Anatoli eye (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Events, Politics,  and India. Venkat TL (talk) 07:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep: A limited glance at the article tells me that this is probably notable enough to warrant a procedural close in the face of this obviously bad-faith nomination, which ranges from POV issues to borderline incoherent. I would not be opposed to a discussion to determine whether this falls under WP:NOTNEWS or not, but that conversation can't productively occur in this current environment. Curbon7 (talk) 04:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep As a bad-faith nomination. Article is in a poor shape and a proper AfD may be necessary. AusLondonder (talk) 00:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - It is unclear what policies the nominator is trying to refer to as it seems like the nominator is just throwing around random policy. However, the nominator's statement may fall under WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. As for the substance of the article itself, the subject seems to be covered in several reliable sources, if in need of a little copyediting. If this turns out to not have lasting significance per the 10-year test, then we can revisit whether the page may be deleted. (Note that I commented on Template:Did you know nominations/Attack on Delhi Chief Minister's house prior to this AFD.) – Epicgenius (talk) 00:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.