Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attack on Stavropol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Slightly early per WP:SNOW, no way this is going to be kept.  Sandstein  11:36, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Attack on Stavropol

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article is not yet ready for mainspace. Lacks sources, needs a good copy edit to make sense. I suspect this is a machine translation from somewhere else but not sure where. Annwfwn (talk) 23:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History and Military. Annwfwn (talk) 23:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Nevermind, I see that this page was created by @Great Circassian, a user banned for sockpuppetry. I nominated it for speedy deletion instead. I apologize for wasting folks' time. Annwfwn (talk)
 * Annwfwn (talk) 23:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I untagged the article. This was not block evasion so CSD G5 is not suitable. Liz Read! Talk! 00:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah ok so I did it right the first time. Annwfwn (talk) 00:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: Article looks completely messy and text is not properly sourced. HarukaAmaranth  春香 23:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
 * This is how all of User:Great Circassian's articles look like. So few sources that it's impossible to tell whether they were real events or hoax articles. Liz Read! Talk! 05:45, 26 December 2023 (UTC)


 * This is some kind of historical fantasy. There is not a single word in the Russian Wikipedia about this "attack". A Google search didn't yield anything either. --Khinkali (talk) 22:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Such a mess that even if this was notable, the only reasonable move is to blow it up and start over. -Ljleppan (talk) 10:33, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The source given is too badly formatted to check. I can't tell if this is a hoax, a non-notable historical raid, or a potentially notable battle badly presented.  Eluchil404 (talk) 23:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per the arguments above. I searched for sources but couldn't find anything of value. (As mentioned, the single reference in the article is too poorly formatted to locate.) Even if this topic is found to be notable, the article is such a mess with nothing great in the edit history to fall back on that we should start over. Bsoyka  (t &bull; c &bull; g) 04:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: per बिनोद थारू (talk) 04:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete this poorly source mess that may at least partly include hoax material/sources. Do not draftify. If there is anything here worth including in Wikipedia, it needs to be rebuilt from scratch. Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 06:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.