Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AttentionTrust

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Joyous (talk) 21:55, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

AttentionTrust
Notability not established. Possible vanity. Note that according to the external link provided, they have no members! "AttentionTrust" only gets 3 Google hits. Sonic Mew | talk to me 18:45, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Response: We are currently hosting the founding conference. The site will be up in the next few hours. If you would prefer us to hold back on this entry until then, we can comply. Thanks. (Unsigned response by )


 * Delete, vanity. If you're the ones founding this organization you shouldn't be the ones listing on Wikipedia. Wait till you've gotten media coverage, then someone unaffiliated with your group will add it if it's notable enough. --Angr/undefined 19:33, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sounds like self-promotion from another misguided person that believes a Wikipedia article begets notability, when it's really the other way around. "Attention Trust" doesn't seem to find anything relevant either. Niteowlneils 19:39, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It would seem to me that if you just had the founding conference several hours ago, you can't possibly be worthy of an encyclopedia article yet. Aerion//talk 04:28, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete self promotion. JamesBurns 04:38, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete premature. It strikes me that the notion of Attention Trust and the advocacy that goes with it is being formulated now, and there is a better way to attract attention to AttentionTrust.  Later, it may be appropriate to tie into any Wikipedia treatment of social arrangements and protocols for internet-participating communities. Orcmid 16:37, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably means well, but anybody can put up a website with this kind of empty sloganeering on it. Please come back when you have some record of accomplishment. --Michael Snow 23:28, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete premature. When AttentionTrust has adoption and a following it would be apropriate for someone else to establish a wikipeida entry. Cori.schlegel 11:27, 29 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.