Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attera Orbis Terrarum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. non consensus to delete and rewriting is a disamb page seems to be the consensus of the discussion Spartaz Humbug! 05:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Attera Orbis Terrarum

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Only two albums in this series and both have articles. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I created this article as a reference point for those who might have fallen into some confusion over there being two DVDs as well as there having been tour of the same name from which the DVDs were recorded. I think this means of clarification is very useful particularly if somebody just types in "Attera Orbis Terrarum" without knowing the background. Dark Prime (talk) 11:12, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Or perhaps I should say, a disambiguation point. Dark Prime (talk) 11:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Change into a disambiguation page which is a rather minor change but more in keeping with the material. Tomas e (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * And retain the name 'Attera Orbis Terrarum' as a redirect to the new page? Dark Prime (talk) 17:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * A disambiguation page would just be replacing the page as it is now with just links to the separate DVD pages. An example and information about them can be found here. Howan (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm familiar with disambig pages myself. Just I must have blundered with this page in particular by not inserting categories etc. Dark Prime (talk) 18:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Change into a disambiguation page It would better serve the purpose of the page and do it more clearly. Howan (talk) 18:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - the present version of the page only says the series was for the "promotion of their 2005 studio album Attera Totus Sanctus". Thus only one album is involved—unless the nom means the DVDs?  If the page cannot be expanded (and, crucially, referenced), then, IMO, any relevent content should be merged into Attera Totus Sanctus and the present page used as a disambiguation page listing only the DVDs and pointing to that album.  I.e. more or less as now (but but probably stripped of the navbox) but with the addition of the various dab temps and cats etc.  Notable enough, though, going by the related album and artist pages, so I don't quite follow the nom's rationale: lots of concert series have only two or three related DVDs but are still notable enough for WP (though their articles are usually more developed, to be fair)  --Jubilee♫ clipman  23:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.