Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attila Juhasz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Attila Juhasz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Attila Juhasz is a very poorly written article covered in external links, no references. The primary editor of the article is the subject of the article itself which causes it to read like a sad promotional advertisement. I believe the subject fails wiki tests of notability. The publications he's written for are not wiki articles. Companies he's connected with are not wiki articles. His one book is not notable and not known well to the populace. --Hutcher (talk) 03:08, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - five years without a "References" section; and it seems unlikely a decent one can be created, as a search reveals no sign of notability, the only sources seeming to be pages created by the subject, social networking and IMDB. There is some interference from other people of the same name, but there are in any case very few candidate sources. I think we can conclude "No WP:RS". Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article is indeed promotional at this time and would need a significant rewrite, but what concerns me is that I haven't found any significant third-party sources to establish notability. I found one relevant link here but it is a press release, the other results I have found are to an irrelevant Attila Juhasz, a politician. Unfortunately, the article appears to have remained the same since September 2009, when an IP replaced the redirect to the politician's article. Two of the users, Attilaj and Acwllc, strongly suggest that the subject himself or people affiliated with subject have edited the article. Additionally, it seems that the article has never received any useful edits and nearly all of them appear to be, as mentioned, the subject himself or people affiliated with him. I strongly suspect that the four most recent IPs are the subject as well, two of them range to Arizona and the other two range to Japan. SwisterTwister   talk  22:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. MaNeMeBasat (talk) 14:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions . — Frankie (talk) 17:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.