Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attitude change

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 02:20, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Attitude change
Dictdef. --W(t) 07:23, 2005 May 30 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks like a bit more than a dictdef and certainly has potential for expanding to an encyclopedic article. Sjakkalle 09:11, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dicdef, plus the meaning of the phrase is no more than the meaning of "attitude" and "change" composed.  Quale 16:00, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, a dictdef but could be expanded. UkPaolo 16:19, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. More than a dicdef. --Sn0wflake 23:33, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete dicdef Denni &#9775; 01:29, 2005 May 31 (UTC)
 * Merge/redir to attitude. Radiant_* 13:14, May 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Some potential. JamesBurns 09:01, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Doesn't appear to have a potential for becoming encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, delete. - Mike Rosoft 13:32, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Please explain how this can be turned into an encyclopedic article. I'm curious. Mandel 23:52, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * A lot could be added. Regarding the presence of this as a common plot twist in literature and movies, regarding the possible psychological origins of this change, regarding how this affects day-to-day life... there is quite a bit to be added to this article, still. --Sn0wflake 00:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.