Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attorney in fact for a URIE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 03:13, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Attorney in fact for a URIE
Too narrow a scope regarding a specific occupation working at a specific organisation. I mean, we don't write something like programmers for Microsoft. And it seems to have neutrality problems and was created purely to attack the people in question. Delete. Elle vécut heureusement toujours dorénavant  (Be eudaimonic!) 13:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete must be written by a lawyer because it is completely incomprehensible. Atrian 15:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with flamethrower.--MONGO 16:18, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Izehar 18:36, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Unincorporated reciprocal inter-insurance exchange as per above decision for "Board of directors at a URIE". All worthwhile information has already been merged.
 * Sorry, forgot to sign N Shar 19:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Movementarian (Talk) 08:37, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. CJewell 19:13, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.