Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Chitnis (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy keep. The consensus of the community is clear. Canderson7 (talk) 03:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Atul Chitnis
This person is not notable. He does not have any significant achievements to his name and is unknown in his own country, except maybe in some limited Linux/Open Source circles. He has no international visibility. Plus his page still reads like a marketing brochure, in spite of the NPOV facelift. I move for immediate deletion.

RigilKent 20:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Please note that the nominator's only edits consist of nominating this page for deletion, and also that this page was kept in a previous AfD: Articles for deletion/Atul Chitnis. Canderson7 (talk) 20:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The person is certainly notable. There have been several references provided in the article which are about this person.
 * Also, the article does not look like marketing brochure and in fact several of the edits are made by some admins. If there is a contest on NPOV, that should be discussed in its talk page, to resolve them through discussions. I oppose this proposal of deletion. - KNM Talk - Contribs 20:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. Don't say "he is not notable" when you mean "I haven't heard of him". utcursch | talk 03:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - Ganeshk  ( talk ) 22:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep - bad faith nomination.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep I suspect this is trolling. GizzaChat  &#169; 02:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.