Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atul Kumar Sharma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Atul Kumar Sharma

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCREATIVE and WP:GNG tendentiously moved to main space by paid editor so bringing here for discussion. Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Most references are self-published and the rest is the same press release mirrored. RoseCherry64 (talk) 19:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:10, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - only has spam references with disclaimers like This story is provided by PNN. ANI will not be responsible in any way for the content of this article. (ANI/PNN) on all articles. Fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE due to a complete lack of valid sources Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable as discussed above. But for films, I always feel that we had a guideline linking people involved in films and WP:CREATIVE. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:44, 26 November 2021 (UTC)


 * KeepThese are all Atul Kumar Sharma's Genuine works, also added Wikipedia links of the shows where you can find his name and streaming links to some tv shows in the ref section where you can find his name and books as the author is Atul Kumar Sharma's creation, it's all genuine works, not for publicity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aqzswxdecfrvgtb (talk • contribs) 10:34, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * None of this addresses any of the 4 points at WP:CREATIVE Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Please don't mass message every single delete voter's talk page. RoseCherry64 (talk) 18:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: While the paid editor has self declared, their move to mainspace is deprecated. The draft would have been AFC declined for the reasons given by the nominator. I am not inclined to draftify. I opine for a policy based deletion Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 09:52, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The more I look any this the more I see a very clumsy WP:ADMASQ. The alleged references include half a dozen to Wikipedia! I can't even see enough material to stubbily. Total WP:BIO and WP:NAUTHOR failure. Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 14:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No WP:SIGCOV whatsoever to support any kind of WP:BIO criteria. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:BIO due to want of significant coverage in reliable sources, which I failed to find on Google.  Java Hurricane  15:42, 29 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.