Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atwar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:42, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Atwar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. The1337gamer (talk) 21:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 21:39, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't find any reliable sources covering the game, either as AtWar or Afterwind. Doesn't seem like there's even a Metacritic page for it. -- ferret (talk) 21:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * There is a Metacritic page, it's incorrectly titled: . There's no reviews though so no help in showing notability, I can't find any significant coverage from reliable video game sources. --The1337gamer (talk) 22:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Displays no references under WP:GNG. Sudden interest on this article erupted after the managers started to ask every player to edit it -- Usien6 msg &#8226; his 01:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Restore to Redirect i can't believe I'm saying this but this started as a not too bad Neelix redirect to a Iraqi journalist who was murdered and received several press freedom awards. This game is at least as notable as your typical pageant winner. Legacypac (talk) 04:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Restoring the redirect sounds okay to me -- Usien6 msg &#8226; his 14:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now at best as nothing from the current article suggests even minimally better notabiltiy and improvement with my searches finding nothing better at all. Notifying who has frequented this article as shown by the history.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete on notability grounds. User:SwisterTwister I noticed the redirect being turned into an article (hence no new page review) and I was just keeping an eye on it to keep the worse of the junk out while I waited to see if the authors would make any reasonable claim to notability. I didn't see any signs of it turning into a useful article, so I punted to the nominator to see if he or she knew of any reliable sources (games are not my area). Meters (talk) 07:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Forgot to say, Neelix or no, I don't object to restoring the original redirect if it's useful. In fact, if this article were to survive (as unlikely as that seems) the article should be "AtWar" rather than "Atwar", leaving the redirect still available. Meters (talk) 07:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as failing WP:GNG with no reliable, secondary, in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. It appears all the current sourcing is either primary or unreliable (user-based). I cannot find any more sources for either title. The article is primarily WP:GAMECRUFT. Original redirect seems reasonable. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 16:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.