Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Au-délà de Cap-Noir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is one of the rare cases where I must overrule all "keep" opinions because they are unsubstantiated or contrary to policy. The issue is notability, which requires reliable third-party sources. Some "keep" opinions assert that such sources are cited, but they do not establish why the three existing sources meet our requirements, and they clearly do not. is a user-edited site where people can upload their own film descriptions, is a CV which is not about the film, and  gives a 404 error. The other "keep" opinions argue that the topic is "valuable" or that the article's creators are probably "knowledgeable", but these are not arguments with which one can substitute missing sources per WP:GNG.  Sandstein  12:37, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Au-délà de Cap-Noir

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable film with nothing to support it having its own article. Nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM. One possible review, but 2 are the bare minimum. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:32, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:32, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:32, 13 July 2021 (UTC)


 * - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).
 * --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:NFILM. WaddlesJP13 (talk &#124; contributions) 01:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even a search to find sources did not turn up any possible sources, therefore almost certainly failing to be notable. — CVValue (talk) 13:55, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The two active inline cites appended to this entry confirm that, although additional links would be helpful, this documentary represents a valuable ethnographic record. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 21:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ambrosiawater (talk) 10:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The references look like they need some work, but this isn't a reason for deletion. Our concern is notability. Observe (per the article's talk page) that this page was created as part of the Share Your Knowledge project, and was created or expanded by African Film Festival of Cordoba. Given the circumstances, and the presumption that the creators of the article are probably more knowledgeable about this subject than I am, I'm prepared to give this article the benefit of the doubt. RomanSpa (talk) 10:56, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes GNG with enough significant coverage available. Zackdasnicker (talk) 09:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep There are enough sources available to justify notability.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:04, 3 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.