Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audacity Innovative


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus  DGG ( talk ) 07:55, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Audacity Innovative

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Part of a promotional walled garden built around Cristhian Andrews. Non notable company. Lacks coverage, awards, recognition. Article has a mass of sources but none are independent reliable sources with any depth of coverage about this company. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:16, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Another walled garden article around the Black Moses film, likely paid-for and fails WP:CORP. § FreeRangeFrog croak 16:56, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   14:00, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Other Andrews articles have been deleted. This should follow. Does not meet notability guidelines. Zigmundbratwurst (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 August 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 17:39, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as my searches found no good coverage and we can simply wait until that happens. SwisterTwister   talk  21:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  00:58, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.