Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audax Films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Audax Films

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. North America1000 20:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a corporate web page, nor is it a platform for advertising. -- HighKing ++ 20:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – filelakeshoe (t / c) &#xF0F6;  21:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: I am not finding better than passing mention for this firm (nor under Kortschak Films which may be a later name), and the article makes no claim beyond being a firm going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 07:32, 5 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.