Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aude Moreau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Aude Moreau

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 18:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:34, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Dougal18 (talk) 14:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The French article linked by has much more information. Moreau was in the St Etienne team that won the Coupe de France Féminine de Football and has clearly had a long career in top-level French women's football. The article should be tagged for refimprove and it needs development, not deletion. Passes GNG. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * : What article, exactly? Patapsco913 hasn't linked anything here from what I see. Also, a long career with St Etienne and a Coupe de France Feminine win doesn't give any notability if the player doesn't pass WP:GNG with reliable, independent sources. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * . Look at the French Wikipedia linkage banner at the top of the article, which was placed by Patapsco913. There is much more information about the subject in the French Wikipedia article. No Great Shaker (talk) 20:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Did you look at the French article! It's empty! There is no prose and no references apart from 3 profiles! If anything the fact that the French article is empty helps reinforce that this article should be deleted. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:11, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * It is lacking prose, true, but there is a heap of info which indicates a long-time top-level player. My vote stands. No Great Shaker (talk) 02:49, 25 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - in my searches, the three best sources seem to be Eurosport, Foot d'Elles and Le Progres. The Eurosport source is quite clearly WP:SIGCOV but I'm on the fence about whether the other two contribute towards GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment, Spiderone. IMO, the Foot d'Elles source can't really be considered a secondary or tertiary source because it's an interview directly from the subject itself. The other one is practically WP:ROUTINE because it is just talking about who won the Saint Etienne player of the season award. Paul Vaurie (talk) 22:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. WCM email 07:32, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 16:16, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established with significant coverage in sources. The French article also fails WP:NOTDATABASE, hardly evidence that this one should be kept. Avilich (talk) 01:23, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - I agree with Paul Vaurie's analysis of the sources that I found. Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable sources Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 06:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.