Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audi India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Clear consensus not to delete outright, which is really the only thing that needs to be decided here. I don't see any clear consensus on whether to merge with Audi or leave as a stand-alone title. That discussion can continue on talk pages. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:14, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Audi India

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No reason for a country-specific subsidiary of a brand to have its own page when the information on that page could - and likely should - be merged into the main article about the brand. ( edit ) In my opinion, Audi India fails COMPANY, with "no inherent notability". Striker force Talk 17:10, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. No argument for deletion has been made. Nomination only proposes merging. Thincat (talk) 18:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * "No reason for a country-specific subsidiary of a brand to have its own page..." - Shall we apply COMPANY and "no inherent notability"? Striker force Talk 19:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, unnecessary. ~SML  •  TP   23:18, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Audi I'd say the nominator's argument is proper; opening tells us it's the company's Indian division. History basically states its establishment date then marketing boilerplate about wanting to be #1 in the country, then tells us their line in the market, but with a clear cheap shot at the country with 'assemble these models in India with cheap local labour', and a NOTDIRECTORY about where their dealerships are located; that's not enough for an article for me. I could also see the 'see alsos' in the article getting redirections themselves as they have the same structure.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. A country-specific article bases its notability on information specific to the country, including the presence of local manufacturing, assembly and training facilities and the choice of vehicles offered for sale, particularly those that are only sold in the country or that differ from the counterparts sold in other countries. Consider expanding these potential claims for notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 04:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment As it stands right now, little to none of the suggested material you've mentioned is present in the article. Striker force Talk 13:37, 25 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Merge Per nom. Standalone article does not passes notability Accesscrawl (talk) 04:08, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per Thincat. Merge discussion should not be in AFD. AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:23, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment the nom actually suggested that it fails COMPANY. Striker force Talk 15:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: As the article was not Closed before another editor provided a redirect !vote with justification, "no nom reason provided" appears insufficient justification to be counted for a Close (as they are only procedural Keep justifications). Therefore a relisting for more general consideration seems in order

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 10:38, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Audi.Fails NORG comprehensively.The SK !votes are semblant of unnecessary process-wonkery. &#x222F; WBG converse 13:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge with Audi and Delete. Not convinced that it deserves a Redirect. None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic is not independently notable, fails GNG and WP:NCORP  HighKing++ 15:17, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.