Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AudioConexus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

AudioConexus

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I found nothing to suggest better sourcing. notability and improvement with my most fruitful searches here, here, here, here and here. Pinging contributors and also passing editors  (who removed speedy) and  (who removed promotional words). SwisterTwister  talk  22:21, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotional fluff. Trivialist (talk) 22:33, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. If there are reliable, secondary sources that meet WP:CORPDEPTH, I couldn't find them. Grayfell (talk) 00:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 *  Delete Sources do not appear to exist.-- Jayron 32 02:59, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 05:16, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 05:16, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment – the creator in the comments claims this company produced the "world's first wireless GPS tours in multiple languages". If true, this would lend credence to notability. Can anyone find a good reference? See 2008 Press Release. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 19:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That source doesn't support the claim that it's the world's first. It says it's "the first GPS tours in the region to provide a rich and compelling history of the Nation’s Capital and the Ottawa River", which is so specific it's kinda funny. Also, is it "the world's first wireless GPS tours (in multiple languages)" or "the world's first wireless GPS tours in multiple languages"? If the former that might be a legitimate claim to notability with sources, if the later, I don't think that's especially significant. Grayfell (talk) 22:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete No independent reliable sources are presented to justify inclusion. Hasteur (talk) 19:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.