Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audioloop


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 00:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Audioloop

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatent advertizing, speedy declined  Chzz  ►  10:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Keep Seems notable, nothing a good cleanup couldn't fix. Consider cleanup tags rather than tagging for deletion. Jenuk1985  |  Talk  10:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Question: have you read Speedy keep? Which of the criteria on that page do you think applies to this discussion? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, overzealous use of the word speedy there! Jenuk1985  |  Talk  13:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, sorry for nit-picking. It's just something that irritates me :) &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete And this is very close to a speedy-spam in my mind. It doesn't seem notable to me, 2500 users is hardly a lot in a year, it has no external sources to back up those claims anyway. If you cleaned up the unsourced claims and peacock words, you'd be left with nothing much, and certainly nothing notable. -- Ged UK  13:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete; no notability asserted. Ironholds (talk) 13:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, spamtacular. - SummerPhD (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N as there is no significant coverage about the topic of the article. Without this there is only a promotional advert. Themfromspace (talk) 15:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge relevant content to Steinberg. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  21:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: trivial coverage. JamesBurns (talk) 09:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources. A few regurgitated press releases about their mix contest at launch -- Whpq (talk) 19:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.