Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auditors of Reality


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 02:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Auditors of Reality

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Declined prod. The original reason was ''Unsourced, inferences from the source novels are likely largely WP:OR. No indication of notability as a separate topic (WP:GNG) it was declined because It seems that much of this is sourceable and are import characters in very well known series of novel. A fuller discussion is needed.'' There is content which is sourceable and encyclopaedic here. A merge might be a possible outcome. No vote from me. Salix (talk): 11:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per my prod nomination cited above. There's no third-party sourcing that would make this obscure subtopic notable, and as a whole this fails WP:WAF and WP:NOTPLOT hard. Such content is for fan wikis, not an encyclopedia.  Sandstein   18:09, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into Discworld gods seems the most appropriate place.--Salix (talk): 18:56, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:37, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I've left a note at Talk:Discworld which may get a few more people to the discussion.--User:Salix alba (talk): 06:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I see no sources at all on the article. Beyond that, I see no assertion these have any notability outside of the novels. I have read most of the discworld novels, and I do not think these are ever major enough characters to need an article in Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:04, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.