Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audu Paden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:28, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Audu Paden

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable producer. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Passing mentions only in news sources, only substantial coverage is on non-RS social networks. Jay D. Easy (t&#8202;•&#8202;c) 15:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jay D. Easy (t&#8202;•&#8202;c) 15:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:30, 24 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep sources exist though most not in English. Balle010 (talk) 15:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment where? Jay D. Easy (t&#8202;•&#8202;c) 12:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep sufficiently noteworthy. He may not be a publicity hound, but this is still a silly nomination. — Kaz (talk) 04:50, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment please explain how this makes the article exempt from WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Jay D. Easy (t&#8202;•&#8202;c) 12:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * delete at best one source might add toward GNG, but that requires more than one source. Wikipedia is built on verrifiability, so we cannot keep an article unless people have included the relevant sources in the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:41, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG but am willing to switch vote upon 's delivery of references. I can only find incidental mentions in articles mentioning work that he has worked on but not significant coverage of him as the subject. — BriefEdits (talk) 02:18, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment here are some sources:, , Balle010 (talk) 15:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the person fails WP:GNG due to lacking in-depth coverage about them in multiple reliable sources. Since all the sources I've seen, including the ones here, seem to be extremely trivial mentions. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:42, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, prolific director/producer with many credits. See Books. Someone should add references to the article: they exist. Wm335td (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The sources provided are trivial coverage, and no one has been able to come up with anything better, including the purported other-languange sources. Fails GNG. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:24, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Drives me nuts when people are challenged to come up with significant coverage, throw up a handful of namedrops and/or casual mentions, and no doubt smile triumphantly. This is the case here: I've not seen a single source presented that provides the subject with significant coverage.   Ravenswing      22:24, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject is American, working in the US. If there were reliable, independent sources I would expect them freely available in English. All we have is suggestions that foreign language sources may exist. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Ifnord (talk) 22:41, 10 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.