Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August 1952


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to 1952. czar 06:16, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

August 1952

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We don’t have pages for exact months in a year. 1952 does the job. CoolSkittle (talk) 00:47, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I think a disambiguation page would be good? MenfesKidus40 (talk) 01:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Also, there are no entries titled August 1952, so no, a disambiguation page is a bad idea. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:41, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per below. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge into 1952, which is the same topic, per WP:PRESERVE. Andrew D. (talk) 15:09, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge into 1952 and 1952 Births, August etc (concur with Andrew D. for rationale). Perhaps redirect there as well. Greenshed (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to 1952, which is covering precisely the same ground, splitting it into events, births, and deaths. It is not helpful to have rival list articles trying to do the same thing.  Not sure whether the resultant redirect should be kept or salted.  Peterkingiron (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge -- very good idea. Time to move on folks. Bearian (talk) 17:52, 24 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.