Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August 26 (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. kingboyk 11:37, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

August 26 (disambiguation) and May 6 (disambiguation)
If you're looking for August in the year 26, you should go to the year 26 and look for August there. If we really wanted to do this method universally, we'd have a ton of disambig pages to make. Fbv 65 edel (discuss 01:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. We are also unlikely to ever have useful articles about specific months in the years 1-31. Kusma (討論) 02:41, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * delete, per nom. I struggle to see how this could ever be useful, or why any editor would bother to link to it.--cjllw | TALK  02:42, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Kusma. BryanG 04:06, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. — [[Image:Flag_of_Ottawa%2C_Ontario.svg|20px]] [[Image:Flag of Ontario.svg|20px]] [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|20px]]  nath a  nrdotcom  ( T •  C  • W) 04:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, this is a useless disambig page. Are we going to have similar pages for all 365 days of the year? J I P  | Talk 08:42, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. This is definitely the most useless disambig page I have ever seen. Who would search for August in the year 26?? Grand  master  ka  16:03, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Hey, I have an odd sense of humo(u)r. --Vossanova 18:15, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Useless redirect.. --Tollwutig 18:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Worthless. WarpstarRider 01:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Fagstein 04:37, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Worthless.  If we had some date standards, it might even be a speedy.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 18:22, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * LOL. have to agree with BJAODN here. VegaDark 23:19, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per BJAODN :). &mdash;-- That Guy, From That Show!  (esperanza) 2006-04-21 13:45 
 * Absolute 100% Delete. Obscure times in history should have articles on years only, not on divisions of years. Georgia guy 20:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per comments above. Are there any more of these laurking around? -- Karada 20:32, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN is the only place for this. Stifle (talk) 20:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN 64.193.70.223 16:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN This user seems to be fond of creating silly articles relating to numbers and dates. This user has created many other silly articles such as Category:Numbers of the googol family, Category:Number families, July 12 (disagumbination), June 8, 2006, Deaths in 2047, 2 0 6 7 and Year 2 kilo. They've also made silly redirects in the form of 0743, 0002, 4/8/2005, October 1979, '90's, 2 0 1 5 and 2 0 1 6. They've been told constantly to stop making these silly articles and redirects. But this user still seems to continue to do so. I find this nonsensical disambiguation page quite funny though. Stop war! 17:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not only inappropriate article, but would create a nightmare precident. Peter Grey 17:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC) After looking as some of the author's edits, despite assuming good faith, I would have to conclude the article is willful vandalism. Peter Grey 16:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN per above. Hot water heater 01:24, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.