Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/August 27, 1990

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Article has already been deleted. Joyous 04:12, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)

August 27, 1990
Everything worth saying here can be found at Stevie Ray Vaughan, August 27 and/or 1990, and nobody is going to search for this as a title, or make a link to this in an article. We ought to just eschew it. &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 09:55, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, there's no need to duplicate dates for specific years for exactly the reason mentioned above. We have a standard date format and we should stick to it. Mgm|(talk) 11:26, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Of course it has to go, it's non-standard and unnecessary. Deb 12:57, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rje 13:48, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Yup, a no-brainer, delete. --fvw *  16:18, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Francs2000 | Talk| (Graham) 19:40, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-standard date duplicating. Megan1967 00:31, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. ugen 64 00:34, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as a tribute and a fork. Wyss 03:46, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete should be nominated for speedy deletion/consensus in VfD later on. Brownman40 07:13, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. fork. Cleduc 07:35, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Deleted. Rafa&#322; Pocztarski 10:46, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Huh? When? How? Why? Can we have a deletion log entry? Is the voting period over yet? Alphax (talk) 13:50, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, this wasn't a speedy delete. Could someone undelete please? --fvw *  16:47, 2005 Jan 3 (UTC)
 * The speedy deletion tag was added to it by Brownman40 and it was then deleted by Rafa&#322; Pocztarski. I have restored it. -- Francs2000 | Talk  19:52, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Here is the deletion log entry as requested. Please do not add messages saying &ldquo;This page is a candidate for speedy deletion, because: there was a consensus to delete the page at Votes for deletion/August 27, 1990 &rdquo; when it is not the case. Thank you. Rafa&#322; Pocztarski 05:57, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * comment: Better yet: don't take speedy tags with invalid reasons at face value. Consensus for deletion on VfD does not make something a candidate for speedy deletion; VfD and CSD are distinctly deparate processes. Doublecheck the validity and applicability of notices before speedying.    &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 00:32, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.